Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 5 results ...

Annamalai, T R and Hari, S (2016) Innovative financial intermediation and long term capital pools for infrastructure: A case study of infrastructure debt funds. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 21(03), 231-52.

Asiedu, R O, Frempong, N K and Nani, G (2016) Parametric time overrun estimation of building projects. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 21(03), 253-68.

Ekemode, B G and Olaleye, A (2016) Convergence between direct and indirect real estate investments: Empirical evidence from the Nigerian real estate market. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 21(03), 212-30.

Oke, A E and Ogunsemi, D R (2016) Structural equation modelling of construction bond administration. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 21(03), 192-211.

Ullah, F, Ayub, B, Siddiqui, S Q and Thaheem, M J (2016) A review of public-private partnership: critical factors of concession period. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 21(03), 269-300.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: public-private partnership; literature review; concession period; decision making matrix
  • ISBN/ISSN:
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMPC-02-2016-0011
  • Abstract:
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the critical decision factors of public–private partnership (PPP) concession which is complex due to a number of uncertain and random variables. To identify critical factors contributing to determination of concession period, this study reviews the published literature. It also identifies countries contributing most in PPP research. As a whole, it provides a mutually beneficial scenario by formulating a decision-making matrix. Design/methodology/approach This paper reviews the literature published during the period 2005-2015. A two-staged methodology is followed on retrieved scholarly papers: first, countries contributing to PPP are identified along with authors and affiliated institutions. Second, using frequency analysis of shortlisted critical factors, yearly appearance and stakeholders affected, a decision matrix is formulated. Findings The most contributing country toward PPP research is China, followed by the USA both in terms of country- and author-based contribution. In total, 63 factors are identified that affect PPP concession out of which, 8 per cent are highly critical and 21 per cent are marginally critical for decision-making. Practical implications Critical factors of PPP concession period will be identified with the help of decision-making matrix. This will help in adequate resource allocation for handling critical factors ensuring project success. Researchers may also understand the research trends in the past decade to usher ways for future improvements. Originality/value This paper reports findings of an original and innovative study, which identifies critical success factors of PPP concession period and synthesizes them into a decision-making matrix. Many of the previous studies have identified and ranked the critical factors but such a synthesis has not been reported.